The arena needs a little more room.
This preview is tuned for a desktop or laptop. Mobile support is coming after the team review.
Open this link on a larger screen to play the full guided demo.
Return to KairosThis preview is tuned for a desktop or laptop. Mobile support is coming after the team review.
Open this link on a larger screen to play the full guided demo.
Return to KairosA queue with 4 slots. Two promises keep it honest.
Get full wrong by one clock tick and data is destroyed, silently. This bug class has shipped in real silicon.
full-proof (under assumed: inv_count_sync, inv_state_sync)fifo.sv
We took a real block from a RISC-V processor and let the AI make it a little smaller.
Then a proof engine checked that the new version behaves exactly like the old one. Not a million test cases. Every possible case, forever.
Here one case broke, a 5-step sequence that silently corrupts data. So this change is rejected, and the exact steps are recorded on the other side.
The receipt records which tools ruled, and the one command to re-run the whole check yourself.
If every case had passed, this page would say proved. We never round “probably” up to “proved.”
the testssampled 10,000 cyclespassed ✓the mathchecked every sequencerefuted ✕Smaller pointer and Simpler data path both ✓ proved. Next, see the same block in a real run.
the opening preset is deliberately unsafe · the verdict applies to configuration 101 as a whole · all 8 configurations have recorded verdicts
not a chip. prove one promise about doors, under every button press. ~60s.
english claims → kernel-checked Lean proofs.
prove an agent can never delete production data, over all possible requests.
we're building toward a world where AI systems and the tools they create come with stronger, checkable guarantees.
work with us to explore what formal verification could do for you or your agents, especially when AI touches something that matters.